Monday, March 29, 2010

Warming of the Global kind

For some reason, when often I tell someone who does not work in the environmental sector that I am interested in the environment, I get a response about global warming. Maybe that person just saw "An Inconvenient Truth" or really likes Al Gore or thinks that climate change is all made up. Actually, 9 times out of ten, it's the latter. I'd try to explain to that person how environmental science is NOT the same as studying global warming, or how one fluorescent light bulb really doesn't make a difference. Nonetheless, they keep complaining until they get tired. In light of that, I've decided to debunk the relationship between global warming and environmental science:


  • Global warming is bulls**t because it snowed a lot this winter, and even last winter. If it's snowing more and more, it can't possibly be getting warmer. I get a lot of that. However, remember that regardless of how much it's snowing evidence still shows that the air has been getting warmer recently. Warmer air absorbs moisture more readily. With more moisture in the air on average, you are likely to get more snow in the winter.

  • So, are you going to fix global warming? Environmental science IS NOT the same as studying climate change. That's called climatology. Environmental science is the study of the different forces in the environment, of which climate is only one.

  • I'm not going to switch to the new fluorescent bulbs because they have dangerous stuff in them. So, it's true that compact fluorescent bulbs (CFLs) have mercury in them, which incandescent light bulbs do not. However, CFLs actually reduce the amount of mercury that's released into the atmosphere through coal power plant emissions by 79%. You can look at the EPA's factsheet for the original graph here.

  • Yeah, but if you throw CFLs out, there are all sorts of toxic chemicals that could poison the environment. That's also true, which is why you're not supposed to throw them out in regular trash. Click on that link in the previous paragraph for recommendations for disposal and steps to take if you break a CFL. If you're argument is that we shouldn't use them because people won't dispose of them properly, there are already plenty of things that we use that people don't dispose of properly on a regular basis: printer cartridges, turpentine, paint thinners, industrial/drain cleaners, certain types of paint, motor oil, oil filters, car batteries, elderly relatives, antifreeze, computers, computer monitors, roofing tar, transmission fluid, countless older appliances using now-banned substances such as freon, etc. You get the idea.
  • I read that things like switching from plastic bags to using cloth bags don't really help the environment that much. Why do you still take actions like that? It's all in how you view it. It's true that switching from plastic to cloth doesn't lower the amount of energy consumed drastically, but it's still a step. If you're the kind of person who believes that no progress is better than some progress, then it's a valid action. Plus, it's mildly appalling just how many bags the average family goes through. My roommates and I only use cloth bags for grocery store trips, and yet we still have a surplus of plastic bags that continues to grow.

This addresses some of the more common questions I get. Seeing as I didn't even get to cover half of my intended topics, there will probably be a part 2 in the near future. Feel free to comment below with other questions.

Thursday, March 18, 2010

The big announcement

So yeah, I still haven't started my second blog yet. However, I promise I will very, very soon. No really. However, part of the reason I'm doing this is that I'm going to create two accounts to separate the types of content that I normally would post to a blog like this. This blog will remain a source for information about my life, about my travels, and some of my opinions. However, the second blog will contain some of my more controversial essays, my art, and my fictions writings.

That's why my second blog will be anonymous. I don't know how long it will remain anonymous, but I'm not planning to link it from this blog and I'm also not planning to mention anything it that would give off my identity. That's partially because I don't want people to look me up and get my rambling opinions and the like as the first thing they see. I'm not even going to tell anyone the url.

Part of it had to do with the fact that this blog was really losing its focus and needs to get back to that. It started with swamps, continued to art, then included El Salvador, jeopardy, and everything else in between. I want to focus this blog more on personal experiences and the environment. I'll still include photography and the like (I have really cool stuff along the way), so keep an eye out.

So there you have it. Thanks to everyone who reads this, and look out for an updated Blogging the Swamp and a heavily disguised second blog by me.